|
accessing: i *thought* the advantage of creating any SQL procedure/function was the entity is stored in procedure cache load time: Java vs C++ compare here http://www.idiom.com/~zilla/Computer/javaCbenchmark.html Martin ______________________________________________ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission. > Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:54:44 -0400 > From: wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx > CC: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle and Postgresql > > In response to "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbondc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > For me, "Oracle stored procedures can be encrypted." is a very real and > > > valuable argument. > > > It would certainly be a valuable feature in pgsql (in the enterprise space). > > > > I don't see how that's any more effective than writing your stored > > procs in C in postgresql. > > Perhaps the fact that the implementation time/effort for a C procedure > is something on the order of 10x that for a pl/pgsql procedure? > > -- > Bill Moran > Collaborative Fusion Inc. > http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ > > wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Phone: 412-422-3463x4023 > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general See how Windows Mobile brings your life together—at home, work, or on the go. See Now |
