On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:06:08 -0700 David Fetter <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > As long as the disease of "Intellectual property" is running > > > around, that "I can encrypt my code" will provide some felt > > > benefit for PHBs.... > > > > I have to disagree here. Encrypting stored procedures is not just > > about forcing customers to pay software maintenance. > > Please to explain how you imagine this to be so. > > > For us, it's about *protecting hard work and intellectual property*. > > Yes, and of course nobody else does "hard work" either. Don't you > mean you're "protecting" this stuff by forcing people to pay for it? Are we going to start a VI vs Emacs argument too? Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
