Jack Orenstein <jack.orenstein@xxxxxxx> writes: > Our application is running Postgres 7.4, (working on conversion to 8.3 > right now). Our testing involves various forms of violence, including > shutting off power and kill -9 postmaster. Do you have reason to trust either your kernel or your disk drives under such abuse? In general I'd bet on the drives being at fault a lot sooner than any other part of the food chain. Complete disappearance of files that should be there is a fault at the filesystem level or lower, anyway. > The question is how to check for consistency in the case of > large tables, which are split into multiple segments, (e.g. 123456.1, > 123456.2). I.e., how can I find out how many segments there should be? The kernel-defined EOF is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. There is no other authority. All segments before the last one should be exactly 1GB, but the last one can be anything up to that. Consult the comments in md.c for more details. (I think 7.4 may treat some corner cases differently from 8.3 anyway.) regards, tom lane
