Search Postgresql Archives

Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:59:34 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I find it pretty unlikely that Slony would be unable to help you
upgrade here.  Obviously you can upgrade one database at a time.

Also, mostly it's not the database size what's a concern, but rather
the size of the largest table.

As I recall (I could be wrong) Slony syncs the whole set as a single
transaction. So if he has his entire database as a set he may
have a problem regardless of the largest or smallest table. I would also
agree that 30 million rows is likely not a problem but he should still
check his velocity.

FWIW, Londiste doesn't work with sets and, instead, maintains replication state, as well as giving you the option to add/remove tables from replication, on a table-by-table which can be observed from the command line.

Erik Jones

DBA | Emma®
erik@xxxxxxxxxx
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux