Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Scara Maccai <m_lists@xxxxxxxx> writes: >>> I got that there should be no difference... plus, I don't get any >>> errors, >> >> You should have. The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be >> part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a >> sequence of operations that avoids those checks. Turning a table into a >> view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and >> it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree. > Is this a TODO? Seems so. I think it's just a minor bugfix, but if you want to put it in TODO for a day or two, go ahead... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
