Tom Lane wrote: > Scara Maccai <m_lists@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > I got that there should be no difference... plus, I don't get any > > errors, > > You should have. The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be > part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a > sequence of operations that avoids those checks. Turning a table into a > view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and > it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree. Is this a TODO? Seems so. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
