On Feb 11, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Actually it's not just autovacuum; it's any lazy vacuum. It's hard to tell those processes apart in pg_stat_activity. Perhaps we could haveadded a column in pg_stat_activity indicating processes that don't holdold tuples, but I feel that would have been a little too much.
I don't think it'd be too hard to construct a regex that would catch all vacuums, after which you could throw out FULLs. I'm thinking something like
\s*vacuum((\s+full){0,1}\s+\S+){0,1};{0,1}Where \s indicates whitespace and \S indicates not whitespace (sorry, don't have a regex manual handy...)
You could probably even simplify that to \s*vacuum(\s+full){0}Of course, you'd want to perform all of those in a case-insensitive manner.
-- Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>