Search Postgresql Archives

Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Vlad Marchenko" <marchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I'm curious if that new hash aggregation algorithm was put in 8.3 with the 
> performance increase as a goal

Yes.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg01179.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-06/msg00007.php
(and nearby messages)

> or it was simply a required change to support 
> some other new feature of 8.3? Right now the switch from 8.2 to 8.3 doesn't 
> seems a favorable step for the type of application that we have...

You are condemning a demonstrably better algorithm on the basis of one
test case.  If you poke around a bit harder you will find other cases
where it is faster than 8.2 because of having better distribution.

			regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux