Hello,
I wanted to share performance-related test results for Postgresql
8.3RC2 and 8.2.6. In both cases we used a freshly imported database
followed by analyze verbose command. Same server was used for testing
(2.6.23.14-107.fc8 x86_64) for each versions; both postgreses were
compiled with "-O3 -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -m64" flags. In both
cases default configuration was used with increased shared buffers to
1Gb (total server ram is 32Gb), increased work and maintenance mem,
enabled autovacuum, increased default_statistics_target to 100,
increased effective_cache_size to 20Gb, disabled fsync and increased
checkpoint_segments. Total size (on disk) of the tables involved in
the query was around 300Mb.
1. Freshly imported DB size on disk was about 3% smaller for 8.3
2. We ran several tests and found 8.3 generally 10% slower than 8.2.6.
We took special measures to make sure that no third factors involved
(no other apps running, all data was cached from disks, etc). Below
is one of the queries that we used for testing (I anonymized table
names) along with query plan for both 8.3 and 8.2. The query execution
plans are the same for both versions, but what we found quite
interesting is that if we add all the times from each line of 8.2's
query plan, it roughly adds-up to the total execution time. For 8.3's
plan each line shows a shorter time, yet resulting in longer total
runtime. Also, summing 8.3's plan lines doesn't come close to the
total execution time:
SELECT _."a_id", SUM(_."counter")
FROM ts.t_c AS _
LEFT OUTER JOIN ts.t_a AS __1 ON _."a_id"=__1."id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN ts.t_i AS __3 ON _."i_id"=__3."id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN ts.t_b AS __2 ON __3."b_id"=__2."id"
WHERE (_."date_day" >= '2008-01-01 00:00:00' AND _."date_day" <=
'2008-01-27 23:59:59')
AND __1."status" IS TRUE
AND __2."status" IS TRUE
GROUP BY _."a_id"
8.2.6 QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HashAggregate (cost=134877.04..134899.04 rows=200 width=52) (actual
time=21517.837..21517.890 rows=47 loops=1)
-> Hash Join (cost=2450.09..111489.75 rows=550289 width=52)
(actual time=76.083..7691.579 rows=2593557 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (_.i_id = __3.id)
-> Hash Join (cost=19.20..95377.74 rows=934651 width=56)
(actual time=0.119..4933.928 rows=2596942 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (_.a_id = __1.id)
-> Append (cost=0.00..76276.09 rows=2596252 width=56)
(actual time=0.014..2988.950 rows=2596942 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_c _ (cost=0.00..21.10 rows=4
width=56) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: ((date_day >= '2008-01-01'::date)
AND (date_day <= '2008-01-27'::date))
-> Seq Scan on t_c_2008_01 _
(cost=0.00..76254.99 rows=2596248 width=56) (actual
time=0.011..1979.606 rows=2596942 loops=1)
Filter: ((date_day >= '2008-01-01'::date)
AND (date_day <= '2008-01-27'::date))
-> Hash (cost=18.30..18.30 rows=72 width=4) (actual
time=0.094..0.094 rows=72 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_a __1 (cost=0.00..18.30
rows=72 width=4) (actual time=0.004..0.067 rows=72 loops=1)
Filter: (status IS TRUE)
-> Hash (cost=1950.44..1950.44 rows=38436 width=4) (actual
time=75.931..75.931 rows=59934 loops=1)
-> Hash Join (cost=57.45..1950.44 rows=38436 width=4)
(actual time=0.829..54.760 rows=59934 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (__3.b_id = __2.id)
-> Seq Scan on t_i __3 (cost=0.00..1263.82
rows=65282 width=8) (actual time=0.005..16.852 rows=65282 loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=50.90..50.90 rows=524 width=4)
(actual time=0.499..0.499 rows=524 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_b __2 (cost=0.00..50.90
rows=524 width=4) (actual time=0.004..0.312 rows=524 loops=1)
Filter: (status IS TRUE)
Total runtime: 21518.097 ms
8.3RC2: QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HashAggregate (cost=132352.98..132572.98 rows=200 width=52) (actual
time=24354.972..24355.019 rows=47 loops=1)
-> Hash Join (cost=2379.09..108954.69 rows=550548 width=52)
(actual time=76.188..8177.510 rows=2593557 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (_.i_id = __3.id)
-> Hash Join (cost=16.20..92904.25 rows=935090 width=56)
(actual time=0.140..5304.968 rows=2596942 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (_.a_id = __1.id)
-> Append (cost=0.00..73796.62 rows=2597473 width=56)
(actual time=0.043..3272.024 rows=2596942 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_c _ (cost=0.00..21.55 rows=4
width=56) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: ((date_day >= '2008-01-01'::date)
AND (date_day <= '2008-01-27'::date))
-> Seq Scan on t_c_2008_01 _
(cost=0.00..73775.07 rows=2597469 width=56) (actual
time=0.040..2245.209 rows=2596942 loops=1)
Filter: ((date_day >= '2008-01-01'::date)
AND (date_day <= '2008-01-27'::date))
-> Hash (cost=15.30..15.30 rows=72 width=4) (actual
time=0.091..0.091 rows=72 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_a __1 (cost=0.00..15.30
rows=72 width=4) (actual time=0.003..0.061 rows=72 loops=1)
Filter: (status IS TRUE)
-> Hash (cost=1882.44..1882.44 rows=38436 width=4) (actual
time=76.027..76.027 rows=59934 loops=1)
-> Hash Join (cost=55.45..1882.44 rows=38436 width=4)
(actual time=0.835..54.576 rows=59934 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (__3.b_id = __2.id)
-> Seq Scan on t_i __3 (cost=0.00..1197.82
rows=65282 width=8) (actual time=0.004..16.096 rows=65282 loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=48.90..48.90 rows=524 width=4)
(actual time=0.513..0.513 rows=524 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_b __2 (cost=0.00..48.90
rows=524 width=4) (actual time=0.003..0.307 rows=524 loops=1)
Filter: (status IS TRUE)
Total runtime: 24355.179 ms
Any ideas on what-we-were-doing-wrong are welcomed
--
Vlad
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
