Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Surprising (?) Sequence Behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane schrieb:


At least for me this is surprising!

Why do you find it surprising?  Per spec, the SELECT output list is not
evaluated at rows that fail the WHERE clause.  This must be so; consider
examples like
	SELECT 1/x FROM t WHERE x <> 0;

Of ocurse!


I think what you need is three levels of nested SELECT, with the
nextval() done in the middle level, and probably an "OFFSET 0" in the
middle one to keep Postgres from collapsing the top and middle together.


For the archves.
This works:

DROP SEQUENCE IF EXISTS s;
CREATE TEMPORARY SEQUENCE s;

SELECT * FROM
(
   SELECT
      nextval('s') AS num,
      tablename AS name
   FROM
   (
      SELECT
         tablename
      FROM
         pg_tables
      ORDER BY tablename
   ) AS t
   OFFSET 0
) AS ranked
WHERE
   ranked.name = 'pg_am'


Thanks a lot!
richard

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux