On Jan 19, 2008 6:14 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Gregory Youngblood wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 23:46 +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote: > >> David Fetter wrote: > >> > In that case, use one of the existing solutions. They're all way > >> > easier than re-inventing the wheel. > >> > >> Existing solutions can't handle multiple masters. MySQL can do it at > >> least in a ring arrangement. > >> > > What about pgcluster? It's supposed to be able to provide synchronous > > multi-master replication for postgresql. > > I looked at that, too, but it wasn't really a "cluster of equal peers" > sort of solution, which is what I am after. Still, thanks for pointing > it out. Oh, and there's this too: Cybertec sync-multi-master http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.752 http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.752 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
