On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:27:08PM +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote: > Andrew Sullivan wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:09:45PM +0000, gordan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> That's just it - I don't think any user-land libraries would >>> actually be required. One of supposed big advantages of MySQL is >>> it's straightforward replication support. It's quite painful to >>> see PostgreSQL suffer purely for the sake of lack of marketting in >>> this department. :-( >> >> The "straigtforward" replication support in MySQL is seriously >> broken. > > I am not arguing that it isn't! :-) I am merely trying to implement > something at least as good (or rather, no more broken) for > PostgreSQL with a minimum of effort. In that case, use one of the existing solutions. They're all way easier than re-inventing the wheel. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@xxxxxxxxxx> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@xxxxxxxxx Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org/
