Hi Tom, > "Sander Steffann" <s.steffann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > From: "Harald Fuchs" <hf0217x@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Forget inet. Check out http://pgfoundry.org/projects/ip4r/ and be > happy. > > > I would be happy if it would support IPv6 :-) Are there plans to > > make ip6r or something like that? > > What's the point? You might as well use the regular inet type if you > need to handle ipv6. Well, the OP said to forget about inet, and I like the ip4r range type. I hoped there was something better/nicer/shinier :-) Thanks, Sander ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
