"Madison Kelly" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> SELECT d.dom_id, d.dom_name FROM domains d WHERE (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM users u
> WHERE u.usr_dom_id=d.dom_id) > 0 ORDER BY d.dom_name ASC;
>
> Which gives me just the domains with at least one user under them, but not
> the count. This is not ideal, and I will have to come back to it next week. In
> the meantime, any idea what the GROUP BY error is? If not, I'll read through
> the docs on 'GROUP'ing once I get this deadline out of the way.
I think you just want simply:
SELECT dom_id, dom_name, count(*)
FROM users
JOIN domains ON (usr_dom_id=dom_id)
GROUP BY dom_id, dom_nmae
ORDER BY dom_name
You don't actually need the HAVING (though it wouldn't do any harm either)
since only domains which match a user will come out of the join anyways.
You can also write it using a subquery instead of a join
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT dom_id, dom_name,
(SELECT count(*) FROM users WHERE user_dom_id = dom_id) as nusers
FROM domains
) as subq
WHERE nusers > 0
ORDER BY dom_name
But that will perform worse in many cases.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
