Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Locking entire database

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thats the fun part, I actually need to allow duplicates in specific cases
but not in this one :)
Shouldn't the serializable level prevent these duplicates? As I understand
it serializable
should give the same result as if the transactions were performed the one
after the other.

Thnx
Panagiotis

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> On 9/14/07, Panagiotis Pediaditis <pped@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > A simpler example,
> >     In the context of one transaction i do many queries of the form
> >           INSERT INTO table value WHERE value NOT IN TABLE;
> >
> > If i have 2 processes running the same 100s of these at the same time i
> > end up with duplicates.
> > Even with isolation set to serializable
> > any ideas?
>
> Unique index?
>

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux