>>
>> So, what is better from the postgres memory point of view: to use
>> temporary
>> objects, or to use common variables ?
>
>A temp table might take *slightly* more room than variables...
>
>> Can you suggest me other point of views to be taken into consideration in
>> my
>> case ?
>
>Code maintenance. I can't think of anyway to replace a temp table with
>variables that isn't a complete nightmare.
With some conversion procedures that is even easiest to do it ;)
Regards,
Sabin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
