Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>>> How much is the age decremented by on a vacuum run then?
>> It should be decremented to the vacuum_freeze_min_age. However, I'm
>> running some experiments with your settings and apparently it's not
>> working as it should.
>
Okay, if it's decremented by the vacuum runs and the decrement is
vacuum_freeze_min_age, how is the age incremented? Is it a reflection of
the number of transactions performed on the database?
> Nah, false alarm, it's working as expected for me. And I see the age of
> databases being correctly decreased to the freeze min age (plus however
> many transactions it took to do the vacuuming work). So I'm still at a
> loss on why is it failing to advance the datfrozenxid of your database.
>
> Please let me have a look at this query result while connected to that
> database:
>
> select relname, relfrozenxid from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't');
>
In the interest of safety, we used the oid value :)
blueface-crm=# select oid, relfrozenxid from pg_class where relkind in
('r', 't');
oid | relfrozenxid
---------+--------------
10762 | 3291686808
10769 | 3291686812
10767 | 3291686811
10739 | 3291686815
10737 | 3291686814
10744 | 3291686961
2830 | 3291686990
2832 | 3291686993
2834 | 3291687121
2836 | 3291686983
2838 | 3291687029
2840 | 3291687676
2842 | 3291686964
2844 | 3291687147
2846 | 3291687144
2570051 | 2947120794
2580908 | 3291686819
1950204 | 3291686821
1950243 | 3291686825
1950245 | 3291686827
1950102 | 3291686829
1950157 | 3291686836
1950168 | 3291686896
1950177 | 3291686900
1950179 | 3291686902
1950181 | 3291686904
1950183 | 3291686906
1950185 | 3291686908
1950193 | 3291686910
1950195 | 3291686912
1950198 | 3291686914
1950096 | 3291686916
1950099 | 3291686918
2449300 | 3291686920
1950128 | 3291686922
1950141 | 3291686925
1950143 | 3291686927
1950145 | 3291686933
1950025 | 3291686935
1950031 | 3291686944
1950036 | 3291686946
2410339 | 3291686948
2443096 | 3291686951
1950112 | 3291686958
10742 | 3291686960
10749 | 3291686967
1260 | 3291686963
10747 | 3291686966
10754 | 3291686970
10752 | 3291686969
10759 | 3291686973
10757 | 3291686972
10764 | 3291686809
2619 | 3291687675
1247 | 3291686978
1249 | 3291686980
1255 | 3291686982
1259 | 3291686985
1248 | 3291686987
2604 | 3291686989
2606 | 3291686992
2611 | 3291686995
2449290 | 3291686998
2449288 | 3291686997
1950022 | 3291687215
1950201 | 3291687008
2610 | 3291687010
2617 | 3291687012
2616 | 3291687014
2601 | 3291687016
2602 | 3291687018
2603 | 3291687020
2612 | 3291687022
2613 | 3291687024
2600 | 3291687026
2618 | 3291687028
2620 | 3291687031
2614 | 3291687118
2609 | 3291687120
2605 | 3291687125
2615 | 3291687127
2607 | 3291687129
2608 | 3291687133
1213 | 3291687137
1136 | 3291687139
1214 | 3291687141
2396 | 3291687143
1262 | 3291687146
1261 | 3291687149
1950028 | 3291686942
1950212 | 3291687151
1950046 | 3291687170
1950214 | 3291687153
1950057 | 3291687230
1950217 | 3291687155
1950062 | 3291687237
1950222 | 3291687158
1950076 | 3291687221
1950237 | 3291687161
1950093 | 3291687224
1950240 | 3291687163
2449510 | 3291687175
1950109 | 3291686830
1950118 | 3291687251
1950148 | 3291687165
1950152 | 3291687167
2410336 | 3291687200
1950138 | 3291686923
1950042 | 3291687169
2449508 | 3291687174
2410341 | 3291686949
2449775 | 3291687195
1950160 | 3291686848
1950049 | 3291687197
1950165 | 3291687218
2410334 | 3291687199
1950174 | 3291686898
1950079 | 3291687202
1950083 | 3291687206
1950007 | 3291687208
1950012 | 3291687210
1950015 | 3291687212
1950018 | 3291687214
1950163 | 3291687217
1950219 | 3291687156
1950234 | 3291687159
2608570 | 3291687227
2443093 | 3291687248
1950069 | 3291687220
2443098 | 3291686952
1950086 | 3291687223
2608567 | 3291687226
1950054 | 3291687229
1950060 | 3291687236
1950065 | 3291687239
1950038 | 3291687245
2443091 | 3291687247
1950114 | 3291687250
(138 rows)
> You can change the relname to oid if showing the table names is
> problematic for you.
>
