"Alexander Staubo" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 6/1/07, Jeff Davis <pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> To be fair to Slony-I, the fact that it does not replicate DDL is a >> feature, not a bug. It's table-based, which is a very flexible design. > I fail to see how that's an excuse not to replicate DDL. > I could be wrong, but I believe Slony fails at this because it is > trigger-based and simply cannot detect DDL changes. You are wrong. The Slony guys say this is intentional, and they have some good arguments. They may be making a virtue of necessity, but automatic replication of DDL is not nearly as open-and-shut a decision as you paint it. regards, tom lane
