On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 17:00 +0200, Alexander Staubo wrote: > the projected Slony-II design, but the setup seems dead simple, and > from the docs I have found it seems to transparently replicate schema > changes, unlike Slony-I. So that's something. > To be fair to Slony-I, the fact that it does not replicate DDL is a feature, not a bug. It's table-based, which is a very flexible design. Regards, Jeff Davis
