On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:11:23PM +0100, Florian G. Pflug wrote: > You'd need a type for large integers first - otherwise your > ty_fraction will be quite limited. I think numeric could be > used for that, though I don't know if numeric guarantees that > at least the operators +,-,* and modulo return exact results > (Don't loose digits). But even if they do, using some existing > library for arbitrary sized integers would probably lead to > better performance. Numeric is an arbitrary sized number library, so using that would be smart. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
