Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Odd behaviour of timestamptz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/21/07, Michael Glaesemann <grzm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I suspect your RPMs build PostgreSQL without --enable-integer-
datetimes. Without this configure flag, timestamps are represented as
floats, with all of the imprecision that implies. See the second note
below the Date/Time Types table:

doesn't seem to be relevant.
i got brand new cvs head (about 40 minutes ago). configured it with:
./configure \
        --prefix=/home/pgdba/work \
        --with-pgport=5810 \
        --with-tcl \
        --with-perl \
        --with-python \
        --enable-integer-datetimes \
        --without-krb5 \
        --without-pam \
        --without-bonjour \
        --with-openssl \
        --with-readline \
        --with-zlib \
        --with-gnu-ld

and rerun the test:
# create TABLE test (data timestamptz);
CREATE TABLE

# INSERT into test values ('1910-01-10');
INSERT 0 1

# INSERT into test values ('1990-01-10');
INSERT 0 1

# select * from test;
           data
---------------------------
 1910-01-10 00:00:00+01:24
 1990-01-10 00:00:00+01
(2 rows)


still something's wrong.

depesz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux