-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/31/07 20:00, Paul Lambert wrote: > Mark Walker wrote: >> One other thing. Another approach to this problem would be to have >> some sort of code signing/authentication capabilities for the >> postgresql server. For instance, you login as an administrator (some >> sort of enhanced privs), you get to look at the databases you have >> permission for. Otherwise, postgresql has to recognize the >> application. Has this ever been discussed? > > I don't think it would be feasible for any RDBMS to recognise the > connecting application, certainly in my view the effort it would take to > alter the postmaster/odbc driver and others would be a lot more than the > apparent gain from having that functionality. I think that capability is already part of the ODBC spec. Well, at least, the ODBC driver for Rdb (http://www.oracle.com/rdb) and it's remote-access framework (SQL/Services) knows the name of the apps that attach. $ MCR SQLSRV_MANAGE71 SQLSRV> CONNECT SERVER; Connecting to server ... Connected SQLSRV> SHOW CLIENT; Service: VECTOR_REF Connect Client Executor Username Node State PID Application PROC_RPT 138.69.183.166 RUNNING BOUND 2025a062 Winsql PROC_RPT 138.69.183.216 RUNNING BOUND 202864f7 erdpro -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFwUzAS9HxQb37XmcRAhc9AJ9QBUaSIWi7zNXaViGPE1CfgiG8qQCgump0 Ys78nYGFPzNjKrlnu/CfU0M= =0OCA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
