Search Postgresql Archives

Re: strange thing with partitioning / rules / plpgsql

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tomas Vondra wrote:

> So far everything seems ok, but let's create another child table
> 
[...]
> ======================================================================
> 
> and do the execution plan again:
> 
> ======================================================================
> 
> EXPLAIN EXECUTE tmp;
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Aggregate  (cost=73.50..73.51 rows=1 width=4)
>    ->  Append  (cost=0.00..62.80 rows=4280 width=4)
>     ->  Seq Scan on parent  (cost=0.00..31.40 rows=2140 width=4)
>     ->  Seq Scan on child_0 parent  (cost=0.00..31.40 rows=2140 width=4)
> 
> ======================================================================
> 
> Ooops, the new child table is missing ;(

Yes, this is a known defect of the partitioning code, and it's one of
(probably the most powerful) reason why it's not enabled by default.

With PL/pgSQL functions you don't have to destroy and recreate the
function -- just close the connection and reconnect.

It's not fixed in 8.2.  There's been a lot of noise about fixing this
for 8.3 (look for "plan invalidation"), but it's not done yet.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux