Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Page <dpage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I've been considering only maintaining the current and previous 2
versions in pgInstaller (the Windows binary distro). But that's a *lot*
harder to maintain than just PostgreSQL because of all the bundled
stuff. In other words, when 8.3 is out, the 8.0 series gets dropped.
What do people think about that? Does anyone think it would be an
unreasonable policy?
Actually, I was just wondering last night about whether we should bother
maintaining the 8.0/8.1 Windows ports at all. Everybody knew going in
(or should have known) that 8.0 on Windows would be a pretty raw port
with a lot of issues, as indeed it was, and so long-term support for it
seems a bit pointless. Perhaps the 8.1 port was up to the point where
it would be sane to use for production, or maybe not.
I haven't tracked Windows-specific issues particularly, but I think
there were at least some important patches we didn't back-port because
of complexity. Certainly 8.0 and 8.1 src/backend/port/win32/ files look
quite a bit different. Does anyone recall any specifics about Windows
patches that were back-ported or not?
Anyway I think that a fair case could be made for dropping the 8.0
branch now, and maybe 8.1 too, as far as Windows support goes. What
you want to do going forward is a different decision --- these are
edge cases because of the newness of the port.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
My 8.2c,
Having 8.1 end of life this soon after the release of 8.2 seems pretty
harsh. I am a Windows user with systems in the field in production and
it would probably be disconcerting to customers to see/read that the
version they are using will not have the benefits of full community
support going forward.
It should also be considered that it is probably more difficult to
alleviate the concerns of people about using even the *best* Open
Source database on a Windows platform (please don't bash us for using
windows for now it is a necessary evil) It seems reasonable to expect
8.1 to be alive for more than 2 months after its replacement is released.
For most production environments just the QA process for a major version
change could take longer than 2 months to schedule and implement, let
alone roll out to the hopefully growing numbers of customers.
Oisin
