Tom Lane wrote: > "imageguy" <imageguy1206@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > So... unless I am missing something, I would suggest you CANNOT us > > plpython (or perhaps any other pl language ??) to process transactions > > I think the point you are missing is that every function already runs > within a transaction. You can't issue BEGIN/COMMIT from within a > function because that would represent destroying the transaction that > supports your execution of the function. Tom, I think this is what I was missing, and of course this makes sense. > AFAICT you are worried about whether several different updates issued by > your function will all be committed atomically. They will be; you don't > need to, and indeed can't, do anything to adjust that. If there was > some other issue you had, you need to be more specific... > You are exactly right on this. I was concered about the atomicity of the updates. In the test environment I setup, it appeared to me that each "INSERT" was being committed immediately becuase and if the next transaction failed it seemed I could still see the the previous transaction after the function ended (ie. using pgAdminIII) After reading your post, I will reset my "test" environment. Clearly I had a flaw somewhere or didn't understand the results I was seeing. Thanks so much for your guidance on this. I will post back here once I have completed the retesting. Thanks. Geoff.
