On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:30:07AM +0100, Rikard Pavelic wrote: > Hi! > > Is there any plan to add implicit declaration of returning parameters > for functions? > Something like: > create function list(in a int) returns setof implicit record as <snip> Just "setof record" will do. As for the implicit declaration of variable names, that's harder. I don't know if you can do that without making things very ambiguous. > One other feature that I miss, but no so much is: > storing the entire function, not just the body > (because of this pg cant remember exactly how I wrote the > function, and if there are many parameters inside I get a looong first line) You should get out what you put in, but it won't remember spacing outside the function body because the lexer eats that. I have a file with the function as I want it and edit that. That way I can have the function exactly how I like it. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
