-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/18/06 20:47, Robert Treat wrote: > On Wednesday 18 October 2006 01:47, louis gonzales wrote: >> Is your server capable? Does it have enough resources to handle many >> connections? >> >> many = ??? 100, 200, 1,000,000,000???? are they concurrent users? >> >> 'good for large applications' = ??? I'd say, how large your >> application is doesn't matter, right... cause that's the front end. How >> well is it coded and does it make efficient logical SQL calls to a well >> structured database... that's another question. >> >> I've got a question, "who wants to play, ask 20 questions?" >> >> Sorry for the sarcasm... but this is now 2:00 a.m. EST, and questions >> have to be specific to warrant an answer. >> > > You know Louis, it's not like you *have* to answer the question if you're > say... tired or, i don't know... maybe a bit cranky? I mean I sympathize > with your response but on the other hand it's bound not to be 2:00 a.m. > somewhere in the world so you could just let those people deal with this one. Yabut, "Is Postgres good for ... many simulataneous connections" is just soooo ambiguous. Just a *little* hint of his volume needs and any sort of Google search would have been welcome. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid? For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFNvY8S9HxQb37XmcRAhPDAJ9LGNO7T1Hox1lqDYZtk7N/0VblQwCg1Kjb OpVGu/NhI4pn1gETn4B7Oik= =k0lk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
