-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As someone who does a lot of moderation using both mailman and majordomo every single day, I can assure everyone that both of them suck in their own way. Majordomo is nice in that I can view a whole bunch of lists at once, and accept/reject en masse, across many lists. Plus, it has a gazillion options, some of which are useful and that mailman does not have yet. Majordomo stinks because it only shows the "from" on the main moderation page, and not the subject line, which would *really* speed up the moderating. Mailman is nice in that it shows the subject, but also gives a whole irritating box per message, which makes quick moderating a pain. I'd rather have a single line list. > Plus, I get the moderation requests on the regular inbox, so they get > handled right away and discarded (the single key macro I wrote takes > care of deleting the mail as well). > > I don't see how the web stuff can be any simpler. You've got to be kidding: that sounds horrible. I don't want an email for every message that comes in. I want to handle them all at once, on /my time frame/. In addition, many of the lists I moderate are admin'ed by more than one person, so sending the message to all moderators is extremely inefficient. As much as I dislike majordomo, I'm not seeing a strong argument here for replacing it. As far as I can tell, there are no problems with our using it: the "unsubscribe-in-subject" thing was added to pgsql-general and seems to be working just fine. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx End Point Corporation 610-983-9073 PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200609071154 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFAEFfvJuQZxSWSsgRAhYuAKDZ3qqAdeRvPm6rIxTW/Ccs4KN35QCg41e1 q1/f0B5O/j8brzQVt3qm4Xk= =XZ+l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
