Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 07:15:43AM -0400, Arturo Perez wrote:
iht=> select max(article_id) from article;
max
------
4992
(1 row)
iht=> select nextval('pk_article');
nextval
---------
4986
(1 row)
Assuming the sequence number is being used correctly why would they
be 6 apart?
The last four transactions could be rolled back, or not committed yet.
Could you elaborate on that? I'm confused...
AFAIK after the sequence was initialised at max(article_id),
nextval(article_id) could never return a number that's lower than
max(article_id).
Unless:
a) the OP managed to query max(article_id) and nextval(article_id)
from different transactions, the one querying nextval being older than
the one querying max.
b) the OP inserted numbers not coming from the sequence; he shot his
own feet.
c) the sequence wrapped around due to reaching numbers exceeding 2^32.
Or are you short on caffeine perhaps? ;)
Regards,
--
Alban Hertroys
alban@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
magproductions b.v.
T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
7500 AK Enschede
// Integrate Your World //