> Will postgresql be a viable database in 20 years? Will SQL be used > anywhere in 20 years? Are you sure 20 years is your ideal backup > duration? > > Very few media even last 5 years. The good thing about open source and > open standards is that regardless of the answers to those questions, > there is no proprietary element to prevent you from accessing that > data- simply decide what it will be and update your backups along the > way. Whether such data will be relevant/ useful to anyone in 20 years > is a question you have to answer yourself. Good luck. I am not to sure of the relevance, but I periodically worked as a sub-contractor for an Oil-producing Company in California. They were carrying 35 years of data on an Alpha Server running Ca-Ingres. The really bad part is that hundreds and hundreds of reporting tables were created on top of the functioning system for reporting over the years. Now nobody know which tables are relevant and with are redundant and or deprecated. Also year after year, new custom text file reports were created with procedural scrips. The load on the server was such that the daily reporting was taking near taking 23 hours to complete. And the requests for new reports was getting the IT department very worried. Worst of all know one there really know the ins and outs of Ingres to do anything about it. Well, I take part of that back. They recently upgrade to a newer alpha to reduce the time daily reporting was taking. :-) Regards, Richard Broersma Jr.
