Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Long term database archival

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Will postgresql be a viable database in 20 years? Will SQL be used anywhere in 20 years? Are you sure 20 years is your ideal backup duration?

Very few media even last 5 years. The good thing about open source and open standards is that regardless of the answers to those questions, there is no proprietary element to prevent you from accessing that data- simply decide what it will be and update your backups along the way. Whether such data will be relevant/ useful to anyone in 20 years is a question you have to answer yourself. Good luck.

-M

On Jul 6, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:

Hi,

What is the best pg_dump format for long-term database
archival?  That is, what format is most likely to
be able to be restored into a future PostgreSQL
cluster.

Mostly, we're interested in dumps done with
--data-only, and have preferred the
default (-F c) format.  But this form is somewhat more
opaque than a plain text SQL dump, which is bound
to be supported forever "out of the box".
Should we want to restore a 20 year old backup
nobody's going to want to be messing around with
decoding a "custom" format dump if it does not
just load all by itself.

Is the answer different if we're dumping the
schema as well as the data?

Thanks.

¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬
AgentM
agentm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux