On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:07:50PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > >On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:25:09AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >>* Joshua D. Drake: > >> > >>>>>Sounds great! But why GPL? Are you looking to sell licenses? > >>>>GPL is to spread it as far and wide as possible as fast as possible. > >>>LGPL? > >>> > >>>My concern would be, I can't use this toolkit for a closed source > >>>application if it is GPL. > >>Closed source? It's a PHP framework. 8-) > >> > >>Anyway, for a web application, the GPL is usually *less* restrictive > >>than various BSD license variants because you do not need to mention > >>the software in the end user documentation. The viral aspect of the > > > >The BSD license requires no such thing. It only requires that you > >maintain the notice in the code. I challenge you to find a less > >restrictive license. :) > > public domain ;) Isn't a license, really. :) -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
