Florian Weimer wrote:
LOL. I was thinking something of the same thing. But as you point out...* Joshua D. Drake:Sounds great! But why GPL? Are you looking to sell licenses?GPL is to spread it as far and wide as possible as fast as possible.LGPL? My concern would be, I can't use this toolkit for a closed source application if it is GPL.Closed source? It's a PHP framework. 8-) The paradox is that web is a more closed environment. The user need never download and install the source.Anyway, for a web application, the GPL is usually *less* restrictive than various BSD license variants because you do not need to mention the software in the end user documentation. Which has me thinking of the idea of requiring a copyright notice in the HTML files sent to the browser, or some type of "powered by" notice. I will add that to the list of ponderables along with LGPL. |
begin:vcard fn:Kenneth Downs n:Downs;Kenneth email;internet:ken@xxxxxxxxxx tel;work:631-689-7200 tel;fax:631-689-0527 tel;cell:631-379-0010 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard