On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:47:51PM +0200, Nicolas Baradakis wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > Before someone runs off to consider this, I've already done it. My > > preliminary patch is here: > > > > http://svana.org/kleptog/temp/gnutls.patch > > I'm speechless. Everything is mostly done already: many, many thanks > for the good work. No problem. > > There are some issues with it, but nothing major. I plan on cleaning it > > up and submitting it soon. > > Please ping me when the patch is completed. I'll talk to the Debian > maintainers of the PostgreSQL and FreeRADIUS packages: if they accept > to add GnuTLS support in a dpatch, the freeradius-postgresql module > can enter in the Debian repository in a short time. Well, you need to be careful here. Just installing GnuTLS support as is will break the latest release of psqlODBC, because they do things with libpq that it wasn't really designed for. Now, I've added an interface to propose a "proper" way for psqlODBC to do its stuff, but to have the Debian package have an API change not present in upstream is a big issue. That, more than GnuTLS itself, is the issue holding it up. OTOH, psqlODBC doesn't appear to be packaged in debian, so that may not be relevent to you. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
