> After reading the explanation, this seems way too specialized a > situation to make a good argument that we need a general feature > of the sort. Ok, however, thanks for your time on it, anyway! > You can get to where you need to be by passing an indicator in > the trigger arguments Argh, it's always the simple stuff ;) Had been overlooking TG_ARGV[] here, that should prove to be a nice compromise, thanks for the hint! -- Best, Frank.
