On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:09:44AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:20:53AM +0300, Andrus wrote: > > This regex allows email addresses containing two dots without any letters, > > like eeta..soft@xxxxxxxxx > > I havent seen any email of such kind. > > That's because the regular expression is wrong: it simply checks > the local part for zero or more non-@ characters instead of checking > against the RFC822/RFC2822 specification. Use a search engine to > find a more complete regular expression (beware: it's long). eeta..soft@xxxxxxxxx is a perfectly functional email address, despite not being in dot-atom form, so technically in violation of RFC 2822. There are few constraints on the local part of an email address, and those constraints are often violated in practice, and cause no problems. I do data analysis on email addresses all day, every day. I'm fully aware of RFC 2822 constraints, and I'm also aware that the correlation between them and the real world is high, but not absolute. If you were using this to validate email software that would be a different thing, but if you're actually working in the real world with real world data and are actually concerned about finding email addresses that are likely to be incorrect (rather than punishing users with noc RFC 2822 compliant email addresses) then looking at the local-part in much detail is really not useful. Cheers, Steve ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
