Search Postgresql Archives

preserving data after updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Is there a canonical form that db schema designers use to save changes to the data in their databases?

For example, given a table with rows of data, if I UPDATE
a field in a row, the previous value is lost.  If I wanted to
track the changes to my data over time, it occurs to me that
I could,

1) copy the whole row of data using the new value, thus
     leaving the old row intact in the db for fishing expeditions,
     posterity, &c.
     -- awfully wasteful, especially with binary data

2) enter a new row that contains only new data fields, requiring
building a full set of data through heavy lifting and multiple queries
through 'n' number of old rows
-- overly complex query design probably leading to errors


3) create a new table that tracks changes
     -- the table is either wide enough to mirror all columns in
         the working table, or uses generic columns and API tricks to
         parse token pair strings, ...

4) other?

Thanks
Scott


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux