pá 27. 12. 2024 v 22:03 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> napsal:
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> It is what it is - and if one is not careful one can end up writing
> hard-to-understand and possibly buggy code due to the various execution
> environments and caches involved.
Yeah, I don't see this changing. The actual answer is that we have
search_path-aware caching of expressions and query plans within a
plpgsql function, which is why the call to foo() reacts to the current
search path. But the types of plpgsql variables are only looked up
on the first use (within a session). Perhaps we ought to work harder
on that, but it seems like a lot of overhead to add for something that
will benefit next to nobody.
> I’ve never really understood why “%TYPE’ exists…
Compatibility with Oracle, I imagine. I agree it's a bizarre feature.
But you could get the same behavior without %TYPE, just by referencing
some other type that has different declarations in different schemas.
This feature is not bizarre - just the implementation in Postgres is not fully complete (and I am not sure if it is fixable). PLpgSQL uses plan cache, but there is nothing similar for types.
It is designed for Oracle where search_path doesn't exist, and where change of schema invalidates code, and requires recompilation. PL/pgSQL and
Postgres are much more dynamic systems than Oracle. Maybe PL/pgSQL functions can holds dependency on types, and when any related custom type
is changed, then the cached function can be invalidated. Unfortunately, the frequent change of search path can kill the performance.
> Add qualification or attach a “set search_path” clause to “create
> function”. Code stored in the server should not rely on the session
> search_path.
Yeah, adding "set search_path" is recommendable if you don't want to
think hard about this stuff.
regards, tom lane
