Hello, I'm experiencing some weird issues when running the following code in a psql session: ============ CREATE TABLE "tbl" ("col" NUMERIC(15, 0)); CREATE FUNCTION "foo"() RETURNS TEXT LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$ BEGIN RETURN '2.4'; END; $$; BEGIN; CREATE SCHEMA "myschema"; SET LOCAL search_path TO 'myschema'; CREATE TABLE "tbl" ("col" NUMERIC); CREATE FUNCTION "foo"() RETURNS TEXT LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$ BEGIN RETURN '5.4'; END; $$; CREATE FUNCTION "run"() RETURNS TEXT LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$ DECLARE "variable" "tbl"."col"%TYPE; BEGIN "variable" := "foo"(); RETURN "variable"; END; $$; COMMIT; SELECT "myschema"."run"(); -- returns '2.4' (when run in the same session) -- reconnect to database here: \c SELECT "myschema"."run"(); -- returns '2' SET search_path TO 'myschema'; SELECT "myschema"."run"(); -- returns '5' -- reconnect to database again: \c SET search_path TO 'myschema'; SELECT "myschema"."run"(); -- returns '5.4' SET search_path TO 'public'; SELECT "myschema"."run"(); -- returns '2.4' again ============ I'm using PostgreSQL verison 16.4. Is this the expected behavior? If yes, where is this documented? If no, what would be the expected behavior? Of course, I could fix this by fully qualifying the table name "tbl" in the function. Nonetheless, I'm not really sure what's going on here. It seems that it matters *both* how the search_path was set during the *first* invocation of the function within a session *and* how it is set during the actual call of the function. So even if there are just two schemas involved, there are 4 possible outcomes for the "run" function's result ('2.4', '2', '5', and '5.4'). To me, this behavior seems to be somewhat dangerous. Maybe it is even considered a bug? Or is it documented somewhere? I remember running into some problems like that in the past already, but unfortunately, I don't remember details. I suppose this is because there is some caching mechanism in place. But apparently it only caches the "tbl"."col"%TYPE and not the "foo"() function call expression. Can someone explain to me what's going on, and what is the best practice to deal with it? Is there a way to avoid fully qualifying every type and expression? Which parts do I have to qualify or is this something that could be fixed in a future version of PostgreSQL? Many thanks and kind regards, Jan Behrens