Hi,
Thanks,
Vidyshree H S
From: Vidyashree H S <Shreevidya.hs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 10:48 AM To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>; Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Kashif Zeeshan <kashi.zeeshan@xxxxxxxxx>; pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Postgresql active-active nodes in cluster
Thanks all for your inputs.
Thanks
Vidyashree H S
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 4:53 AM To: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Kashif Zeeshan <kashi.zeeshan@xxxxxxxxx>; Vidyashree H S <Shreevidya.hs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Postgresql active-active nodes in cluster On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 06:33:39PM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Multimaster > > > That is a pretty old page. There are other solutions, such as pgedge, but the > three most important questions when it comes to active-active replication are: > > * Do you really, really need it? (hint: the answer is no) > * What problem are you trying to solve? > * Are you really willing to suffer the tradeoffs? Agreed, see this: https://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2018.html#December_24_2018 -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you. [EXT] |