> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 7:45 PM > To: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Odd Shortcut behaviour in PG14 > > Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Out of curiosity, what is the point of adding the "true" predicate no > > matter the position? Maybe I've created an incorrect truth table, but > > "true AND" (and "AND true") don't make any logical difference when > > added to (ekey > 0)*.* > > Not only does it not make any logical difference, but it shouldn't make any > practical difference either, because the useless "true" > subclause will be thrown away very early in planning, before any decisions > would be taken on the strength of what is in the ON clause. > So I was skeptical that the details presented were even correct. > I think whatever is causing the behavioral change is something else that the OP > hasn't identified/controlled for. Hard to tell with such fragmentary details. > > regards, tom lane > Apologies but I am struggling to make this happen in isolation. A few things: The true was an error - we previously did not have the AND so needed the true. The devs added the AND of ekey but should have removed the true. We have done that now. There is a difference between the PG versions. The Dev server which works is 14.9 and the QA server which fails is 14.10 Looking at the application logs this function is being called once per display row - it is running successfully around 10 times with the same input params. When it fails, it is with the same params! All I can say for sure is that the first 10 it ignores the lateral join as the (ekey > 0) evaluates to (0>0). However on the next invocation, for whatever reason, even though ekey is still 0, it decides to evaluate the lateral join and fails. If we change the code from (ekey > 0) to (0 > 0) - it always works!! So the planner seems to be making different choices based on other functions being called higher up in the chain. We need a way of telling the planner not to run the lateral join if ekey=0. Sorry I can't provide a testable case - have not been able to reproduce just running this one function multiple times in a loop. Thx Z
