Well, I haven't tried it yet, but I don't believe it will. It will be the same connection in the same transaction. In other triggers, I've done something similiar by inserting a record into a special table called "override" and have other triggers that fire in the same transaction look for a record in that table in order to make a decision about what course of action to take. All the other triggers are able to see the record. I don't see this as being any different. After I try it, I'll let you know. Thanks for the input... On Saturday 29 January 2005 02:00 pm, Ragnar Hafstaà saith: > On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 13:21 -0500, Terry Lee Tucker wrote: > > [on prompting user in the middle of a transaction] > > > Thanks for the reply, Tom. I just had an idea about writting the answer > > from the client to a table designed for that purpose. It could have a > > unique key as the pid and a column for storing the answer. When the > > notice receiver returns, I could have the function check for the answer > > in the table. I have successfully created my own notice receiver and it > > works. > > won't there be visibility problems with this ? > > gnari ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
