On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:41 PM Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hm. I also noticed when looking at this that aborted transactions with
> savepoints are not subjected to the idle_in_transaction timeout which is a
> bit surprising.
Hmm ... I think it's intentional that idle_in_transaction no longer
applies once the transaction has failed. But if there's a live
savepoint, then we should enforce it since resources may still be
held. Seems like a bug, if your observation is accurate.
hm, double checking, it's not.
merlin
