Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hm. I also noticed when looking at this that aborted transactions with > savepoints are not subjected to the idle_in_transaction timeout which is a > bit surprising. Hmm ... I think it's intentional that idle_in_transaction no longer applies once the transaction has failed. But if there's a live savepoint, then we should enforce it since resources may still be held. Seems like a bug, if your observation is accurate. regards, tom lane
