On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 01:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > Egads. So the set of valid Python programs is different depending on what
> > platform you're on? That's just, uhm, insane.
>
> No quibble here.
Funny discussion. Did you ever try a shell script written on
dos/windows, transferred binary to *nix, with for example bash?
Strange errors at the #! line? Yes. Here you are. You cant
blame python for it.
Python bytecode however is in fact running on every platform.
I think an approach where plpython compiles just like plpgsql
should be perfectly valid.
--
Tino Wildenhain <tino@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
