On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:20 PM Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rob Sargent <robjsargent@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I'm about to unleash new versions of the above and related functions
> (args will change), so a drops are imminent. Any reason to hold off on that?
While I've not yet looked at the code, I've got no reason to think
this is anything except fragile argument parsing in \df and \sf.
I'm unsure about the "extra argument ignored" bit but the rest of "not found" issues are due to operator error; specifying a pattern that tries to match the name and arguments at the same time when that isn't how the meta-command is defined to be used.
David J.
