hello,
thanks for the logical answer. it is true that there is a very big difference between open source and commercial DB. but I'm grateful to be able to use postgresql which is quite reliable.
thank you
Yours faithfully
yudianto
thanks for the logical answer. it is true that there is a very big difference between open source and commercial DB. but I'm grateful to be able to use postgresql which is quite reliable.
thank you
Yours faithfully
yudianto
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 12:10 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2022-01-30 at 05:15 +0700, Yudianto Prasetyo wrote:
> I want to ask why postgresql doesn't create a datafile like it has oracle?
>
> I'm confused when I have 2 HDD. HDD 1 is used to install the OS and postgresql database.
> when HDD 1 is full. how to increase the capacity of postgresql database with HDD 2 (without RAID system)?
>
> is there any other way like oracle DB's "add datafile" which can be used to add capacity to another HDD?
The difference between Oracle and PostgreSQL here is that Oracle implemented its
own file system and volume manager, while PostgreSQL uses the facilities provided
by the operating system.
The correspondence is not perfect, but you can compare an Oracle tablespace to
a logical volume with a file system and a datafile to a physical volume.
So to get the same thing in PostgreSQL, you have to interact with the operating
system: add a new physical volume to the logical volume where your database
resides and extend the file system.
To answer the question "why", here are two points:
- PostgreSQL does not have the (wo)manpower to re-invent the wheel on everything,
so we tend to use existing facilities
- Oracle was developed earlier, and one can argue that in those days file systems
were not so great, so there was more need to write your own
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
