>On 1/14/22 1:40 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: >snip] >> We shouldn't be trying to provide >> documentation around how to write a tool like pgbackrest, we should, >> instead, have a tool like pgbackrest in core with its own documentation, >> as most other RDBMS's do. >That's an excellent solution to this problem. While I know the reasons for not having something like pgbackrest in core, I think this is a major drawback for the project. People coming from commercial systems are used to have that tooling included by default. +1 for having that in core Regards Daniel
