On 2021-02-17 08:45:05 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 16:11 -0600, Ron wrote:
> > SQL is only intuitive to people who've done programming... :)
>
> SQL is quite counter-intuitive to people who have only done
> procedural programming.
Yes, different paradigm. SQL is more like a functional or logic
programming language (I often thought that Prolog would make a nice
query language for an RDBMS).
It also fell into what I like to call the COBOL trap: Designing a
language so that looks like normal English in the hope that "ordinary
people" will be able to use it. In reality that doesn't help
non-programmers much (it's still a formal language with precise
semantics and the computer will do what you say, not what you mean), but
makes it harder for programmers.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp@xxxxxx | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
