Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Parallel safety of contrib extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:40:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Winfield, Steven" <Steven.Winfield@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> There was a thread about this back in 2016[1], but I've just been
>> bitten by it and wondered if any (more) extensions, particularly
>> btree_gist, will have their operators/functions verified and marked as
>> parallel-safe?
> 
> Whenever somebody does the legwork and sends a patch ...

This would not be a complicated change as it requires creating a new
version script for those modules.  You can look at commit 20eb273 as
an example, and the work is even simpler now that we just need update
scripts when bumping a module's version (those named foo--1.0--1.1.sql
and not foo--1.1.sql).  Here is the related documentation:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/extend-extensions.html#id-1.8.3.20.15
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux